What they are

Graph methods model your data as nodes and edges then either:

  • find communities tightly connected groups, or
  • learn embeddings vector representations of nodes so you can cluster or detect anomalies in vector space.

intuition —> build a graph of who connects to whom —> find groups that stick together —> or embed nodes so similar neighborhoods land close together

Why security teams use them

  • Operator infrastructure mapping domains, IPs, certs, hosts form clear communities
  • Campaign correlation emails or URLs linked by shared indicators cluster together
  • User device relationships reveal lateral movement or insider groups

Data model

  • Nodes domains, IPs, certs, email senders, users, devices, processes
  • Edges shared cert or hosting, same campaign id, same device usage, process parent child
  • Edge weights frequency, recency, confidence

Community detection algorithms

  • Louvain and Leiden maximize modularity fast and scalable
  • Label Propagation quick heuristic for very large graphs
  • Infomap based on information flow good for flow networks

Outputs community labels per node and a partition score modularity

Graph embeddings to feed clustering

  • Node2vec biased random walks with return p and in out q to mix homophily and structural roles
  • DeepWalk unbiased random walks simpler variant
  • GraphSAGE neural aggregator for inductive embeddings when nodes appear over time

After embedding —> cluster with HDBSCAN or k-means or score anomalies by distance

Security examples that click

  • Domain IP cert graph
    nodes —> domains, IPs, certs
    edges —> resolution events, cert use
    output —> communities per operator; embeddings —> detect new nodes joining a community

  • User device auth graph
    nodes —> users and devices
    edges —> successful logins with weights for frequency and recency
    output —> communities of typical access; anomalies when edges appear across distant communities

  • Process tree graph
    nodes —> processes
    edges —> parent child
    output —> communities of typical chains; rare cross community edges —> suspicious

Practical workflow

  1. Build the graph decide nodes, edges, weights, and time window
  2. Clean remove self loops, cap degree for extreme hubs if needed
  3. Detect communities Louvain or Leiden, store community id per node
  4. Embed nodes node2vec or DeepWalk choose dimensions 32 —> 128
  5. Cluster embeddings HDBSCAN or k-means, label clusters and outliers
  6. Integrate community id and cluster id into tickets and enrichment APIs
  7. Monitor modularity, community counts, churn rate of nodes between communities

Evaluation that matches operations

  • Modularity higher suggests stronger community structure
  • Conductance edges crossing community boundaries lower is better
  • Stability partitions across resamples or time windows
  • Downstream impact triage time saved, incident linkage precision

Pitfalls and fixes

  • Hub domination CDN IPs or shared services connect everything
    fix —> down weight or remove hubs, use edge types and weights
  • Temporal mixing stale edges glue unrelated nodes
    fix —> time windows and decay weights
  • Parameter sensitivity in node2vec poor p and q collapse structure
    fix —> sweep p q and validate with downstream clustering metrics
  • Scale very large graphs need batching and approximate neighbors
    fix —> sample subgraphs or use scalable libraries

Common hyperparameters

  • Louvain Leiden resolution controls community size
  • Node2vec dimensions, walk_length, num_walks, window, p, q
  • GraphSAGE layer count, hidden size, aggregator type, negative samples

Security focused testing checklist

  • Verify edge definitions and weights make sense and exclude noisy hubs
  • Run Leiden with a few resolution values check stability
  • For embeddings sweep dimensions and p q then cluster and score silhouette
  • Hold out a week of nodes check how embeddings place newcomers
  • Add context per community top nodes, shared indicators, exemplar edges
  • Monitor modularity, community churn, and false merge or split rates

Threats and mitigations

  • Indicator stuffing attacker creates many weak edges to join benign communities
    • mitigate —> weight edges by quality and recency, require multi edge types to enter communities
  • Poisoning crafted nodes alter community boundaries
    • mitigate —> gate data sources, cap per source impact, detect anomalous degree changes
  • Concept drift infrastructure and user relationships change
    • mitigate —> rolling windows, decay weights, periodic re detection

Takeaways

Use community detection to map operators and cohorts. Use embeddings to bring graph context into standard clustering and anomaly tools. Weight edges wisely, curb hubs, validate stability over time, and tie results to concrete analyst workflows.

[Original Source](No response)